PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Fossil Studies0 citationsOpen Access

A Quantitative Framework for Assessing Locomotor Asymmetry in Dinosaur Trackways: Testing the Evidence for Limping and Lateral Preference

View Full Paper
ARAnthony Romilio

Key Points

  • This research aims to establish a quantitative method for assessing locomotor asymmetry in dinosaur trackways to improve behavioral interpretations.
  • Introduced a quantitative framework using Welch’s t-test for pace and stride length measurements.
  • Analyzed nine dinosaur trackways based on published data to evaluate asymmetry.
  • Determined statistical significance in observed pace lengths to confirm or refute locomotor irregularities.
  • Seven of the nine trackways exhibited statistically significant pace asymmetry (p < 0.05).
  • Two trackways did not exceed normal locomotor variability, showing no significant asymmetry.
  • Stride length showed no significant asymmetry, confirming the sensitivity of pace metrics to limb bias over stride metrics.

Abstract

Trackways preserve sequential records of animal locomotion and provide some of the most direct evidence of locomotor behaviour in the vertebrate fossil record. Alternating short–long pace lengths have historically been used to infer gait irregularities such as limping or lateral limb preference, but these interpretations typically lack statistical validation, treating mean asymmetry as sufficient grounds for behavioural conclusions without first establishing whether observed differences exceed normal locomotor variability. This study introduces a quantitative framework that addresses this gap by applying Welch’s t-test to pace and stride length measurements, establishing statistical confirmation of asymmetry as a prerequisite for behavioural interpretation. The framework is demonstrated on nine dinosaurian trackways drawn from published data. While all had previously been interpreted as asymmetric, seven exhibited statistically significant pace asymmetry (p < 0.05) and two did not exceed the range of normal variation. Stride length showed no significant asymmetry in any trackway, confirming that pace-level metrics are more sensitive to limb bias than stride-based measures. This framework provides an objective, reproducible standard for evaluating asymmetry claims—a necessary and feasible methodological advance for vertebrate ichnology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anthony Romilio (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac074a46254e215b3ce5https://doi.org/10.3390/fossils4020009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper