PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Optimal Selection of the Effective Echo Time ( TE eff ) for T2 ‐Weighted Fast‐Spin‐Echo MRI of the Prostate at 3.0 T: Effect on Lesion Conspicuity

View Full Paper
DKDahan KimRPRonard PabiEBEric A. Borisch

Key Points

  • This research investigates how different effective echo times (TE_eff) affect lesion contrast in prostate cancer MRI.
  • Phantom and in vivo prospective study with 53 prostate cancer patients.
  • Used multi-slice T2-weighted fast-spin-echo MRI at 3 T with varying TE_eff values.
  • Statistical analysis via Wilcoxon test for reader evaluation scores.
  • No significant difference in diagnostic quality between TE_eff = 150 ms and 100 ms, but reader preference favored TE_eff = 150 ms.
  • Phantom experiments showed T2_eff values can predict optimal TE_eff with 2%–5% accuracy.
  • In vivo measurements indicated effective T2 relaxation times of the prostate are on average 1.5× longer than published T2 values.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Clinical T 2 ‐weighted (T2W) MRI of prostate cancer (PCa) usually implements a 2D fast‐spin‐echo (FSE) sequence, but understanding the echo‐time‐dependent contrast behavior is not straightforward due to the complicated FSE signal evolution. Consequently, consensus‐based recommendations on the optimal effective echo time (TE eff ) to maximize contrast are lacking. Purpose To investigate the effect of TE eff on PCa lesion contrast in prostate T2W MRI. Study Type Phantom and in vivo prospective study. Subjects A standard MRI phantom and 53 prostate cancer patients (29 for image evaluation and 24 for quantitative lesion analysis). Field Strength and Sequence Multi‐slice T2W FSE sequence at 3 T acquired at multiple TE eff values. Assessment Three readers (13, 25, and 27 years' experience) evaluated TE eff = 100 ms versus 150 ms on diagnostic quality and reader preference. The effective T 2 relaxation rates ( T 2,eff ) were measured using FSE sequences in the phantom and used to predict the optimal TE eff maximizing T2W contrasts. From multi‐TE eff scans of subjects with suspected PCa, T 2,eff values of PCa lesions and healthy tissue were measured and used to calculate the optimal TE eff maximizing the lesion contrast. In vivo contrast metrics were measured as a function of TE eff . Statistical Tests Wilcoxon test of reader scores, with p < 0.05 defining statistical significance. Results No statistically significant difference was found in diagnostic quality between TE eff = 150 ms and 100 ms images, but all three readers significantly favored TE eff = 150 ms. Phantom experiments demonstrated that TE eff ‐dependent FSE signal progression can be characterized by T 2,eff values typically 40% longer than actual T 2 values, allowing accurate prediction of optimal TE eff within 2%–5%. Applied to PCa imaging, in vivo measurements indicated that effective T 2 relaxation times of the prostate are on average 1.5× longer than published T 2 values. Data Conclusion The benefits of TE eff = 150 ms versus 100 ms in prostate T2W FSE were supported by reader preference, phantom experiments, in vivo measurements, and analytic optimizations. Evidence Level 2. Technical Efficacy 2.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac2e4a46254e215b3f88https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70351
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improving Prostate MRI: Lessons Learned from the American College of Radiology’s Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Echoes—how to generate, recognize, use or avoid them in MR‐imaging sequences. Part I: Fundamental and not so fundamental properties of spin echoes1991 · 241 citations
  3. 3The sensitivity of low flip angle RARE imaging1997 · 153 citations
  4. 4Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 22019 · 2,501 citations
  5. 5Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods1945 · 14,981 citations