Explores stability in geosynthetic-reinforced embankments, indicating safer design options.
Geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments have been widely adopted for soft ground treatment owing to their effectiveness in controlling settlement, enhancing bearing capacity, and accelerating consolidation. However, existing research has primarily focused on their load-bearing performance and settlement characteristics, while theoretical analysis of embankment slope stability remains insufficient. Although the three-wedge model has been applied to assess the slope stability of such embankments, it typically requires preset assumptions for certain parameters, resulting in limited accuracy in the calculated factor of safety. Based on the generalized three-wedge model and incorporating the structural characteristics of features of GRPS embankments, this study extends and refines the geometric configuration, segmentation approach, and boundary conditions of the wedges. An analytical three-wedge model for slope stability analysis of GRPS embankments is developed, and a solution framework for calculating the factor of safety is proposed. The accuracy of the proposed analytical model is validated through two case studies reported in the literature. The results provide a theoretical basis for the engineering design and parameter optimization of GRPS embankments. • An analytical three-wedge model for slope stability analysis of GRPS embankments is developed. • A solution framework for calculating the safety factor of GRPS embankments is proposed. • The analytical model is validated utilizing two case studies reported in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: