PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026International Journal of Microbiology0 citationsOpen Access

Microbial Profiling and Biosafety Assessment of a Sargassum- Based Liquid Biofertilizer Using 16S rRNA Metagenomics

View Full Paper
YRYaset Rodríguez-RodríguezADAshley Marie Mejía DislaMOMáximo Elías Reynoso Ortega

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the microbial diversity and biosafety of a Sargassum-based liquid biofertilizer compared to a conventional product.
  • Utilized 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing for microbial profiling.
  • Compared Sargassum-based liquid biofertilizer (SBLB-INTEC) with conventional liquid product (LB-BANELINO).
  • Analyzed microbial content for presence of heavy metals and nutrient profiles.
  • Both products contained similar nutrients (K, Ca, Mg) and low levels of heavy metals.
  • SBLB-INTEC showed slightly higher Shannon diversity but no significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between products.
  • SBLB-INTEC's microbial community included a more balanced array of beneficial genera, potentially enhancing nutrient cycling.

Abstract

Sargassum seaweed is increasingly abundant in the Caribbean, creating ecological disruption but also providing biomass for agricultural inputs. This study compares the microbial diversity and safety of a Sargassum ‐based liquid biofertilizer (SBLB‐INTEC) with those of a conventional product (LB‐BANELINO) using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, rather than culture‐dependent methods. Both formulations contained key nutrients (K, Ca, and Mg) and low levels of heavy metals. They harbored dense but relatively simple bacterial communities dominated by Firmicutes, particularly Bacilli, with Proteobacteria and other phyla at lower abundances. Staphylococcus (Staphylococcaceae) was highly abundant in both products, while SBLB‐INTEC showed a somewhat more balanced community, including Delftia and other Comamonadaceae. Shannon diversity tended to be higher in SBLB‐INTEC, but differences in alpha‐ and beta‐diversity between formulations were not statistically significant. Because 16S data cannot distinguish viable from nonviable cells or resolve strain‐level pathogenicity, these results do not prove the absence of pathogens; instead, they provide a genus‐level baseline to guide targeted culture, qPCR, and functional assays. Overall, the combination of a favorable chemical profile and microbial groups commonly associated with nutrient cycling and plant‐associated functions suggests that SBLB‐INTEC could become a valuable component of integrated nutrient management in tropical agriculture, offering hope for a more sustainable future pending confirmatory plant‐response and biosafety studies. We recommend integrating these microbial data into a national biofertilizer monitoring framework, combining metagenomic surveys with targeted qPCR and resistance gene screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodríguez-Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edacdb4a46254e215b49f8https://doi.org/10.1155/ijm/3219583
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper