Systematic review analyzes sea-level rise and land subsidence research trends in the Gulf of Guinea, suggesting key gaps for future studies.
Since the 1960s, research on sea-level rise (SLR) and land subsidence has grown significantly; however, comprehensive syntheses remain limited. This study presents a systematic review of 2171 publications spanning 1964–2025, combining a global perspective with a regional focus on the Gulf of Guinea, a critically underrepresented region within the African continent. The results show a steady increase in publications, exceeding 80 per year since 2015. A combined bibliometric and content analysis approach was adopted, integrating large-scale metadata analysis with an in-depth evaluation of 166 full-text studies corresponding to 311 study sites. Bibliometric analyses highlight four main themes: (1) factors driving SLR and subsidence, including climate, geophysical, and human effects; (2) monitoring methods such as tide gauges, GPS, and InSAR-based land motion tracking; (3) impacts on coastal communities, and ecosystems; and (4) strategies for adaptation and mitigation. A comparative assessment of global research output and Low-Elevation Coastal Zone (LECZ) exposure reveals a marked spatial mismatch, with critically vulnerable regions, such as the Gulf of Guinea, remaining significantly underrepresented (44 studies). The synthesis identifies key conceptual, methodological, and practical research gaps. Addressing these gaps requires holistic frameworks that integrate SLR and subsidence, long-term monitoring networks, advanced modeling, and evidence-based adaptation strategies. By linking bibliometric evidence with the interpretation of research trends and gaps, this study provides an analytical basis for supporting monitoring strategies, coastal planning, and adaptive responses. Additionally, the results highlight priority directions for future research directions in the Gulf of Guinea region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonì et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: