Validates generative AI imagery as effective stimuli in indoor environmental psychology, suggesting enhanced realism.
Despite its efficiency, the structural integrity and geometric accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated imagery used in environmental psychology experiments have not been sufficiently validated. This study investigated the methodological validity and substitutability of generative AI-generated 360° images as experimental stimuli for indoor environmental research. Using a three-stage framework, we generated base panoramas with controlled structural parameters, integrated greenery via AI-based inpainting, and conducted multifaceted validation through objective quality metrics and expert assessments. Quantitative results confirmed high technical integrity, indicating that structural distortions at panoramic stitching points were effectively minimized. Furthermore, the AI-generated stimuli maintained stable visual quality across varying greenery densities. Expert evaluations confirmed that the AI-driven approach significantly outperforms conventional 3D modeling, particularly in terms of presence and realism. By achieving high usability and spatial integrity scores, we established a novel standard for employing generative AI to create high-fidelity virtual environments for architectural and psychological research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: