Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates radon adsorption in adsorbents, indicating effective comparisons under varying conditions.
Reliable determination of radon adsorption properties in candidate adsorbents is essential for developing highly sensitive methods capable of measuring low 222Rn activity concentrations in air. Such measurements are increasingly important in environmental monitoring, climate research, and low-background experiments. Conventional approaches for determining the adsorption coefficient and heat of adsorption are labor- and time-intensive, limiting their suitability for comparative studies under identical conditions. Here, a recently proposed method is applied for the first time in a systematic comparative study. The approach couples solid-state nuclear track detectors (SSNTDs) with adsorbents that simultaneously act as radon collectors and alpha emitters, enabling fully parallel exposure and signal acquisition across multiple samples. Eight adsorbents—three activated carbon fabrics, two bulk activated carbons, and three synthetic zeolites—were evaluated simultaneously over a temperature range of 0–46.5 °C. Activated carbon fabrics exhibited the highest adsorption coefficients, with ACC-5092-10 reaching 11.8 ± 1.3 m3/kg at 20 °C. The heats of adsorption ranged from 24.8 ± 3.9 to 33.3 ± 5.0 kJ/mol, consistent with the literature values. For synthetic zeolites, the adsorption coefficient increased linearly with the Si:Al ratio. The influence of water content was further investigated for the five best-performing materials. The most hydrophobic material, zeolite SA-25 (Si:Al = 25), showed only a 25% reduction in adsorption coefficient under saturated humidity, whereas activated carbons exhibited strong suppression. These results demonstrate the practicality, sensitivity, and efficiency of the SSNTD–adsorbent method for comparative radon adsorption studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pressyanov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: