Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis addresses the gap between measured and predicted values of cosmological constant using fixed point methods.
Discussed is a trying to solve the obvious contradiction in discrepance between the measuring ofcosmological constant (CC) from GRT-description and its calculated prediction in classical QFT.Either then the coupling of CC to theory is wrong or the physical and mathematical methods tocalculate CC by QFT in flat Minkowskispace-background are wrong. Tried is a fixpoint-method tocome to a calculated value of CC which better fits to observation. In this context the sum-rules for1-loop/2-loop in BSM-QFT are solved, three new scalarons (“Stooges“) and two new heavyfermione (“Tweedles“) are introduced to couple matter-field beyond SM to CC and to look atdiscrepances between measuring and calculation in a more consistent way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holger A.W. Döring (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: