Why the study?
Does synchronous pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass reduce infarct size compared to nonpulsatile bypass or controls in dogs with acute coronary occlusion?
Does synchronous pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass reduce infarct size compared to nonpulsatile bypass or controls in dogs with acute coronary occlusion?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Synchronous pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass significantly reduces infarct size and mortality compared to nonpulsatile bypass in a canine model of acute coronary occlusion.
A left atrial-femoral artery (LA-FA) bypass system was designed to deliver synchronous pulsatile blood flow. We compared it with nonpulsatile LA-FA bypass in its effectiveness to limit infarct extension after ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery at its origin in 35 dogs. Nonpulsatile LA-FA bypass resulted in a 70% reduction in the size of infarct. The addition of synchronous diastolic counterpulsation (P-LA-FA) further reduced the size of infarct, when compared with that in controls (95%) or animals that underwent LA-FA bypass (83%). Both LA-FA and P-LA-FA bypasses limited infarct extension and reduced mortality after acute coronary occlusion through effective unloading of the left ventricle. The addition of diastolic counterpulsation to LA-FA bypass led to further significant infarct reduction, when compared with LA-FA bypass alone. These effects were most likely secondary to improvements in myocardial blood flow distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John C. Laschinger (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: