Does clinical presentation (acute MI vs stable/subacute) affect the morphology and ulceration of non-culprit coronary plaques in patients undergoing PCI?
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with acute MI or stable/subacute presentation
Imaging assessment of non-culprit coronary plaques
Acute MI versus stable/subacute presentation
Coronary plaque morphology and frequency of ulceration distant from culprit lesionssurrogate
The study highlights the limitations of imaging in assessing plaque vulnerability, as non-culprit plaque morphology is largely similar between acute MI and stable patients, aside from increased ulceration in acute MI.
Additional plaques are frequently found adjacent to the culprit lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention independent of clinical presentation. The increased prevalence of plaque ulceration but otherwise similar morphology of additional lesions in patients with acute MI versus stable/subacute presentation demonstrates the limitations of imaging in the assessment of plaque vulnerability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Schoenhagen
Cardiac Imaging
Gregg W. Stone
Interventional Cardiology
Steven E. Nissen
Preventive Cardiology
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
University of Washington
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak
Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schoenhagen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69eede42a84321e0ae63c387 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.0000084811.73196.1c
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: