Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Right ventricle GLS can be considered for routine follow-up of TOF repair patients, even though CMR remains the noninvasive gold standard method. Using a single parameter may not allow comparison of the accuracy of 3D RV EF by using CMR and GLS. Further studies with a larger number of patients undergoing TOF repair are required to evaluate the correlation between these examinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: