Key result
Pediatric AI-ECG algorithm accurately detects severe LV systolic dysfunction with ~0.93 AUC.
Why the study?
Does a novel pediatric AI-enabled ECG algorithm accurately detect left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction in pediatric patients compared to adult-trained models?
Observational (n=10,142)
Does a novel pediatric AI-enabled ECG algorithm accurately detect left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction in pediatric patients compared to adult-trained models?
A novel pediatric-specific AI-enabled ECG algorithm accurately detects left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction in children, demonstrating improved performance over adult-trained models.
May support pediatric screening; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Early detection of left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD and RVSD respectively) in children can lead to intervention to reduce morbidity and death. Existing artificial intelligence algorithms can identify LVSD and RVSD in adults using a 12-lead ECG; however, its efficacy in children is uncertain. We aimed to develop novel artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithms for LVSD and RVSD detection in pediatric patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 10 142 unique pediatric patients (age≤18) with a 10-second, 12-lead surface ECG within 14 days of a transthoracic echocardiogram, performed between 2002 and 2022. LVSD was defined quantitatively by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RVSD was defined semiquantitatively. Novel pediatric models for LVEF ≤35% and LVEF <50% achieved excellent test areas under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94) respectively. The model to detect LVEF <50% had a sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.80, positive predictive value of 0.095, and negative predictive value of 0.995. In comparison, the previously validated adult data-derived model for LVEF <35% achieved an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90) for LVEF ≤35% in children. A novel pediatric model for any RVSD detection reached a test area under the curve of 0.90 (0.87-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG demonstrates accurate detection of both LVSD and RVSD in pediatric patients. While adult-trained models offer good performance, improvements are seen when training pediatric-specific models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anjewierden et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=10,142). Novel pediatric artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithms vs. Previously validated adult data-derived model was evaluated on Detection of LVEF ≤35% (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98). Novel pediatric artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithms accurately detected LVEF ≤35% (AUC 0.93; 95% CI 0.89-0.98) and RVSD (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.94) in children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: