PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1984Circulation1,297 citations

The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction.

View Full Paper
JBJ. Thomas BiggerJFJoseph L. FleissRKRobert E. Kleiger

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality following myocardial infarction.
  • Analyzed data from 766 patients enrolled in a nine-hospital study

Structured PICO

Do ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular dysfunction predict mortality in patients after myocardial infarction?

P
Population
766 patients after the occurrence of myocardial infarction
O
Outcome
Total mortality and deaths caused by arrhythmiashard clinical

Both left ventricular dysfunction and ventricular arrhythmias are independent predictors of mortality in the 2 years following a myocardial infarction.

Abstract

We examined the relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality after the occurrence of myocardial infarction in 766 patients who enrolled in a nine-hospital study and underwent two special tests. Frequency and repetitiveness of ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) were determined by computer analysis of predischarge 24 hr electrocardiographic recordings. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined by radionuclide ventriculography and dichotomized at its optimal value of 30%. Frequency of VPDs was divided into three categories: (1) less than one per hour, (2) one to 2.9 per hour, and (3) three or more per hour. Repetitiveness of VPDs was also divided into three categories: (1) no repetitive VPDs, (2) paired VPDs, and (3) VPD runs. These variables were related, one at a time and jointly, to total mortality and to deaths caused by arrhythmias. The hazard ratios for dying in the higher or highest risk stratum vs the lower or lowest stratum for each variable (adjusted for the effects of the others) were: LVEF below 30%, 3.5; VPD runs, 1.9; and VPD frequency of three or more per hour, 2.0. There were no significant interactions among the three variables with respect to effects on the risk of mortality. There was a suggestion of an interaction between each risk variable and time after infarction. LVEF below 30% was a better predictor of early mortality (less than 6 months) and the presence of ventricular arrhythmias was a better predictor of late mortality (after 6 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bigger et al. (1984) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eee031b65c86b636037f5dhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.69.2.250
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ventricular Premature Beats and Mortality after Myocardial Infarction1977 · 663 citations
  2. 2Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial Infarction1983 · 1,614 citations
  3. 3Analysis of prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. Shortcomings of Lown grading system.1981 · 112 citations
  4. 4Determinants of Survival in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias1983 · 509 citations
  5. 5Prognostic Implications of Ventricular Arrhythmias Registered before Discharge and One Year after Acute Myocardial Infarction1978 · 29 citations