PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive hallux valgus correction using 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation: A prospective case series

GFGabriel Ferraz FerreiraDDDavy Gabirol Sevilla DoradoMFMiguel Viana Pereira Filho

Key Points

  • To evaluate the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive hallux valgus correction using 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation.
  • Prospective single-center case series with a planned sample size of 20 and 3-month follow-up.
  • Interim analysis of 8 consecutive patients undergoing fourth-generation MIS using CT-based 3D-printed guides.
  • Data recorded included operative time, fluoroscopy use, radiographic angles, and clinical outcomes (VAS pain, AOFAS score).
  • Mean operative time was 32.2 ± 3.8 minutes per foot.
  • HVA improved from 26.8° ± 6.3° to 6.3° ± 5.0°, and IMA decreased from 10.4° ± 2.8° to 4.4° ± 2.7°.
  • VAS pain decreased from 7.1 ± 0.9 to 0.2 ± 0.6, and AOFAS score improved from 67.4 ± 8.9 to 98.6 ± 3.6.

Abstract

Introduction: Fourth-generation minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus (HV) provides recognized advantages over open techniques but remains technically demanding, with a steep learning curve and dependence on fluoroscopy. Three-dimensional (3D) printing enables the development of patient-specific guides that translate CT-based preoperative planning into the operating room, potentially improving surgical accuracy and efficiency. Methods: This prospective single-center case series follows a predefined protocol (planned sample size 20; 3-month follow-up). An interim analysis was performed on the first eight consecutive patients (14 feet; six bilateral) undergoing primary fourth-generation metaphyseal extra-articular transverse and Akin osteotomy (META) using a CT-based 3D-printed guide. Preoperative DICOM data were segmented to generate 3D models, and osteotomy level, metatarsal translation, and screw trajectories were digitally planned. Guides were produced in biocompatible resin using stereolithography and sterilized prior to surgery. Operative time, fluoroscopy use, radiographic correction (HV angle HVA, intermetatarsal angle IMA), and clinical outcomes (VAS pain, AOFAS score) were recorded. Results: Eight patients (mean age 45.6 ± 14.8 years) comprising 14 operated feet were analyzed. Mean operative time was 32.2 ± 3.8 minutes per foot. Mean fluoroscopy shots were 68.6 ± 8.4, with a mean radiation dose of 1.64 ± 0.30 mGy. HVA improved from 26.8° ± 6.3° to 6.3° ± 5.0°, and IMA from 10.4° ± 2.8° to 4.4° ± 2.7° at three months. VAS pain decreased from 7.1 ± 0.9 to 0.2 ± 0.6, and AOFAS score increased from 67.4 ± 8.9 to 98.6 ± 3.6. Conclusion: In this interim prospective series, fourth-generation MIS HV correction using CT-based 3D-printed patient-specific guides demonstrated acceptable operative times, low radiation exposure, substantial radiographic correction, and marked early improvements in pain and function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferreira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefc23fede9185760d35e7https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2026.v20.2053
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper