Investigates antimony removal in industrial waste, suggesting effective treatment methods.
The feasibility of employing an ion-exchange resin for the recovery of antimony(V) from an industrial waste effluent has been investigated. The source of the effluent is a treatment process designed to reduce the volume of a spent uranium-antimony catalyst prior to its immobilisation and disposal in South Korea; known as the SENSEI Process. Commercial macroporous-type cation (Strong acid cation, Mitsubishi DIAION PK216) and anion (Strong base anion Type I, Mitsubishi DIAION PA316; Strong base anion Type II, Mitsubishi DIAION PA418) exchange resins, as well as macroporous-type chelation resins (Aminophosphonic acid, Lanxess LEWATIT TP260; Sulfonic-phosphonic acid, Purolite MTS957) have undergone batchwise screening. LEWATIT TP260 showed the best antimony removal from sulfuric acid solutions across the entire [H+] range tested (0.01 mM – 2 M) and showed no loss of removal performance as a function of increasing sulfate concentration at high [H+]. The Hill isotherm model produced the best fit for antimony binding to LEWATIT TP260 (Adj. R2 = 0.9969), corresponding to an equilibrium adsorption capacity of 160.55 mg g−1. Second order kinetics (Adj. R2 = 0.9808) best described the kinetic uptake of antimony onto the TP260 resin indicating a chemisorption mechanism. The presence of phosphate [PO43−] had a negligible impact on antimony removal by TP260, however, the presence of molybdate [MoO42−] and silica, both found in the SENSEI effluent stemming from the original catalyst, significantly reduced the performance of TP260.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foster et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: