PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Insights into Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Combined radiomics, PI-RADS, and clinical model improve significant prostate cancer prediction and guide biopsy decision

AAAndreu AntolínRMRichard MastNRNúria Rosón

Key Points

  • This study aimed to create and validate an MRI radiomics-based model to identify significant prostate cancer and improve detection through the incorporation of PI-RADS and clinical variables.
  • Conducted a retrospective observational study using data from 1497 MRI cases of 1395 men.
  • Developed four machine learning models to evaluate the predictive performance of radiomics combined with PI-RADS and clinical variables.
  • Assessed performance using area under the curve (AUC) metrics and decision curve analysis.
  • The combined model of radiomics, PI-RADS, and clinical variables achieved an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.853–0.930), significantly outperforming other models (p < 0.05).
  • Combined model showed the highest specificity (29.41%) and biopsy avoidance rate (18.15%), though differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.313).
  • Incorporating clinical variables and radiomics into PI-RADS helps reduce false positives and unnecessary biopsies.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to develop and validate an MRI radiomics-based predictive model to discriminate significant prostate cancer (sPCa), compare it with PI-RADS, and determine whether incorporating PI-RADS and other clinical variables improves clinical performance. Materials and methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using a cohort of 1497 MRI cases from 1395 men to develop the models. For each case, the index-lesion PI-RADS score, systematic ± targeted biopsy results, and six additional clinical variables were collected. Prostate biopsy samples served as the reference standard, defining sPCa as Gleason Grade ≥ 7. Handcrafted radiomic features were extracted from automatically segmented prostate glands. Four machine learning models were developed: (1) Radiomics, (2) PI-RADS, (3) PI-RADS + Radiomics, and (4) PI-RADS + Radiomics + Clinical Variables. Model performance and comparisons were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), while clinical utility was assessed through the decision curve analysis plot, Clinical Utility plot, and the number of avoided biopsies. Results The radiomics model did not perform significantly better than PI-RADS in the validation cohort (AUC 0.838 vs. 0.833, p = 0.874). The combination of radiomics, PI-RADS, and clinical variables achieved the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.853–0.930), significantly outperforming the other models ( p < 0.05). It also showed the highest specificity (29.41%) and biopsy avoidance rate (18.15%), although the differences were not statistically significant ( p = 0.313). Conclusions Incorporating radiomics and clinical variables into PI-RADS enhances its ability to discriminate sPCa, potentially decreasing false positives and unnecessary biopsies. Critical relevance statement The incorporation of clinical variables and radiomics into PI-RADS enhances its ability to predict significant prostate cancer, helping mitigate some of PI-RADS’s current limitations, such as a significant false-positive rate, and might help reduce unnecessary biopsies. Key Points PI-RADS limitations result in overdiagnosis of indolent prostatic lesions and unnecessary biopsies. Radiomics and clinical variables enhance PI-RADS ability to detect significant prostate cancer. Combined clinical-radiological models reduce false positives and help avoid unnecessary biopsies. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Antolín et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd15fede9185760d3dfchttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02295-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper