PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026BMC Health Services Research0 citationsOpen Access

Bridging ethical and governance gaps in digital health: insights from users and startups in Iran

NSNafiseh Salehnia

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify and conceptualize governance gaps affecting digital health in Iran.
  • Conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with policymakers, entrepreneurs, and healthcare professionals.
  • Performed content analysis of 700 user comments from Iranian digital health platforms.
  • Utilized Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework for thematic analysis.
  • Identified six governance gaps affecting digital health: regulatory, ethical, data governance, quality, institutional capacity, and economic gaps.
  • User comments indicated that governance weaknesses lower satisfaction, perceived fairness, and trust in services.
  • Proposed a governance model emphasizing transparency, responsibility, and participation to improve digital health.

Abstract

Digital health adoption is accelerating in many low- and middle-income countries, yet governance, ethical safeguards, and data stewardship often lag behind technological uptake. This mismatch can undermine user trust, service quality, and the long-term sustainability of digital health innovations. This study aimed to identify and conceptualize key governance gaps influencing the development of Iran’s digital health ecosystem. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using 18 semi-structured interviews with policymakers, entrepreneurs, and healthcare professionals, alongside content analysis of 700 user comments extracted from major Iranian digital health platforms. Data were analyzed through the six-phase framework of Braun and Clarke, combining inductive (data-driven) and deductive (theory-informed) coding. Triangulation between interview and user datasets enhanced validity, and the COREQ checklist guided reporting. Six interrelated governance gaps were identified: (1) Regulatory and Oversight Gap – fragmented authorities and lack of unified licensing; (2) Ethical and Trust Gap – weak accountability and declining user confidence; (3) Data Governance Gap – unclear data ownership and poor privacy protection; (4) Quality and Standardization Gap – lack of evaluation indicators and accreditation systems; (5) Institutional Capacity Gap – limited expertise and low readiness for digital transformation; and (6) Economic and Sustainability Gap – insufficient financial incentives and policy support. Findings from user comments confirmed that governance weaknesses directly affect satisfaction, perceived fairness, and trust in digital health services. Digital health in emerging settings requires a multi-level governance approach that aligns national policy, institutional regulation, and operational accountability. We propose an integrated macro–meso–micro governance model with cross-cutting principles (transparency, responsibility and data integrity, participation, trust) to guide policymakers and platform operators. Strengthening a unified regulator, a national ethics charter for digital health, and a health data governance framework are priority actions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nafiseh Salehnia (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd43fede9185760d3f14https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14439-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper