This article examines the evolution of equitable protections for express trusts in Israel, suggesting significant legal implications.
This article examines the profound transformation that has taken place in Israeli property and trust law over the past three decades: a shift from a rigid, formalistic system grounded in statutory registration of rights to a sophisticated framework of equitable protections. At the heart of this development stands a landmark decision of the Supreme Court, which held that an express trust, even if unregistered, effectively “ring-fences” trust assets against claims by the trustee’s personal creditors and court-appointed receivers seeking to realize them. This article traces the gradual evolution of this protection, rooted in earlier precedents, and analyses the normative and practical implications of the emergence of a uniquely Israeli “equitable shield.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: