Provides a counter-example and alternative proof for curvature varifolds, suggesting new methods for decomposition.
We provide a counter-example to Hutchinson’s original proof of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>C</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {C1,α} representation of curvature m -varifolds with <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mi>q</m:mi> </m:msup> </m:math> {Lq} -integrable second fundamental form and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>q</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {q>m} in [J. E. Hutchinson, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>C</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {C1,α} multiple function regularity and tangent cone behaviour for varifolds with second fundamental form in <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mi>p</m:mi> </m:msup> </m:math> {Lᵖ} , Geometric Measure Theory and the Calculus of Variations (Arcata 1984), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 44, American Mathematical Society, Providence 1986, 281–306]. We also provide an alternative proof of the same result and introduce a method of decomposing varifolds into nested components preserving weakly differentiability of a given function. Furthermore, we prove the structure theorem for curvature varifolds with null second fundamental form which is widely used in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolau S. Aiex (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: