Erratum: Annotated Automatic Pruning of Universal Probabilistic Programming Languages

Gizem Çaylak; Emma Granqvist; Thimothée Virgoulay; Fredrik Ronquist; David Broman

doi:10.1145/3770863

April 25, 2026ACM transactions on probabilistic machine learning.

Erratum: Annotated Automatic Pruning of Universal Probabilistic Programming Languages

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The objective is to correct and clarify mistakes found in the original article on annotated automatic pruning for probabilistic programming languages.
Correction of errors from the original article published in ACM Transactions on Probabilistic Machine Learning.
Review of the automatic pruning techniques utilized within universal probabilistic programming languages.
Clarification of the outcomes and interpretations presented in the original article.
Correction of inaccuracies in the automatic pruning methodology discussed previously.

Implication

Erratum updates findings regarding automatic pruning in probabilistic programming languages, clarifying previous work.

Abstract

This is an erratum for the article “Annotated Automatic Pruning of Universal Probabilistic Programming Languages” published in ACM Trans. Probab. Mach. Learn. 1, 3, Article 15 (August 2025), 33 pages.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Çaylak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd82fede9185760d43b0 https://doi.org/10.1145/3770863

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Erratum: Annotated Automatic Pruning of Universal Probabilistic Programming Languages

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Erratum: Annotated Automatic Pruning of Universal Probabilistic Programming Languages

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

More related papers

More from ACM transactions on probabilistic machine learning.

Keep reading

More related papers

More from ACM transactions on probabilistic machine learning.