Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work examines energetics and dissociation in HCl-water clusters, indicating key variations in proton transfer behavior.
This work examines the effects on intrinsic energetics as the composition of finite (HCl) m (H 2 O) n cluster families containing at least one water molecule is changed at the molecular level, where m ≥ 2 and m + n = 4 − 6, and the associated (Cl − ) x (H 3 O + ) x (HCl) m − x (H 2 O) n − x clusters resulting from the dissociation of x HCl fragments via proton transfer (PT). They are collectively labeled m : n , and x PT indicates the degree of dissociation, from 0PT (no dissociation) up to 3PT. More than 1000 unique minima were identified via ωB97X‐D/6‐31++G(d,p) optimizations and frequency computations. Of those, nearly 500 lie within 5 kcal mol −1 of the corresponding lowest‐energy minimum structure as determined by CCSD(T)‐F12/haTZ‐F12 single point energies: 25 for the 2:2 and 3:1 tetramers, 127 for the 2:3, 3:2, and 4:1 pentamers, and 333 for the 2:4, 3:3, 4:2, and 5:1 hexamers. In four of the nine m : n systems examined (2:2, 3:1, 4:1, 5:1), no low‐energy minima exhibited PT, but the other five (2:3, 3:2, 2:4, 3:3, 4:2) have 1PT and 2PT structures with electronic energies near or below the lowest‐energy 0PT configurations. In the 2:4, 3:3, and 4:2 hexamers, for example, at least one 1PT structure lies ≈4, 3, and 0.5 kcal mol −1 below the lowest‐energy 0PT structures, respectively, based on CCSD(T)‐F12 electronic energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tucker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: