Study evaluated mechanical properties of mortars with treated rice husk ash, indicating thermal stability concerns.
Agricultural waste ashes represent a promising source of supplementary cementitious material (SCM); however, they must be washed (with water or acids) or co-processed with calcium-rich slags to mitigate deleterious reactions. Knowledge gaps remain regarding their fire performance and the evolution of pore-solution pH—both critical parameters for long-term durability. This study evaluated mortars incorporating 10 wt% rice husk ash (RHA), considering three treatment conditions: untreated (U), water-washed (W), and acetic-acid-washed (AA). After 28 days of curing, physical–mechanical properties and pore solution pH were determined. Additionally, selected specimens were subjected to a thermal shock at 500 °C for 1 h to assess residual strength. The ANOVA analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the mechanical behavior of the mortars depending on the applied treatment. Under fire-unexposed conditions, the incorporation of water-washed RHA significantly increased compressive strength and reduced strain, an effect associated with lower water absorption by immersion, reduced open porosity, and higher bulk density. However, after exposure to 500 °C, all mortars experienced mechanical degradation, which was more pronounced in those with pretreated RHA (−52.4% strength and +132.9% strain in W). Mortars with untreated RHA exhibited greater thermal stability, attributed to their coarser porosity that facilitated vapor release. Moreover, all RHA-containing variants substantially reduced system alkalinity (pH ≈ 8), a condition favorable for use with vegetal reinforcements, although limiting for reinforced concrete exposed to chlorides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arciniega et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: