PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Journal of financial reporting & accounting0 citations

Innovation constraints in AI regulation: perceptions of financial sector professionals and strategic reorientation

View Full Paper
DGDaniel Mandel GandritaDRDavid Pascoal RosadoAGAna Gandrita

Key Points

  • This study investigates financial professionals' perceptions of AI regulation constraints and their impact on strategic reorientation within financial institutions.
  • Cross-sectional design with a sample of 250 participants proficient in financial markets, AI development, and organizational innovation.
  • Data analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess relationships between constructs.
  • Financial professionals view AI innovation constraints as regulatory burdens differing across financial sub-sectors.
  • Such constraints promote a strategic shift towards compliance-focused tools over customer-facing AI investments.
  • Perceived innovation constraints significantly predict increased investment in compliance tools, with weaker effects on adopting advanced AI technologies.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how financial professionals perceive innovation constraints imposed by emerging artificial intelligence (AI) regulation and how these perceptions influence their strategic reorientation within financial institutions. The focus is on regulatory barriers and reshaping financial innovation, risk posture and compliance strategies. Design/methodology/approach This study used a cross-sectional design. The initial quantitative phase involves a sample of 250 participants who have expertise in financial markets, AI development and organizational innovation. To analyze this data, a partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships between the constructs. Findings The results show that financial professionals perceive AI-related innovation constraints as regulatory burdens that vary across sub-sectors within the financial sector. These constraints drive a strategic reorientation, encouraging organizations to prioritize investments toward compliance-focused tools rather than customer-facing AI. Furthermore, perceived innovation constraints strongly predict investment in compliance-oriented tools and strategic reorientation, while its effect on the adoption of frontier AI technologies is comparatively weaker and strategically marginal. Originality/value The study provides empirical evidence on how constraints on AI-related innovation influence strategic decision-making in the financial sector. The study’s findings are derived from an analysis of professionals’ perceptions on AI regulation shaping organizational capabilities and the influence of strategic reorientation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gandrita et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefdd1fede9185760d485bhttps://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-07-2025-0606
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Strategic AI Orientation and Technological Innovation: Evidence From Managerial Insights and Panel Data2025
  2. 2AI in the Financial Sector: The Line between Innovation, Regulation and Ethical Responsibility2024 · 31 citations
  3. 3Can Artificial Intelligence Enhance Corporate Financial Risk-Taking Capacity? A Perspective on Innovation Resilience and the Environment2026
  4. 4Ethical Implications and Regulatory Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Finance2025
  5. 5How AI Adoption Can Drive Strategic Innovation with Government Financial Regulators and Public Sector Entities: A Case Study2025