Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey assesses acne impact on management in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with upadacitinib, suggesting targeted counseling for adherence.
Background Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK1 inhibitor, has been associated with acne in up to 7% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in clinical trials. Emerging real-world evidence suggests the true prevalence may be higher, particularly among adolescents and young adults. This study evaluated the prevalence, age distribution, and impact of UPA-associated acne on treatment decisions in a real-world IBD cohort. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted within a prospective IBD BioBank at a tertiary care center. All patients currently or previously treated with UPA (n = 110) were invited to complete a 22-item electronic survey assessing acne history before and after UPA initiation, acne severity, treatments used, awareness of acne as a side effect, and influence on medication management. Results The survey was completed by 100 patients (91% response rate); 54% had Crohn’s disease and 46% ulcerative colitis. The median age was 23 years (IQR 18–35, range 7-66). Prior to UPA, 25% reported acne, predominantly mild. After starting UPA, 48% experienced new or worsening acne; 38% reported it as moderate, 29% as severe, and 46% sought dermatologic care. At time of survey (median 458 days), 52% continued to have acne, well-controlled in only ¼ with treatment; 5% had discontinued UPA due to acne. While 80% felt the benefits of UPA outweighed acne-related concerns, 7% disagreed—despite most achieving clinical remission. Acne was significantly less prevalent at the extremes of age, <13 and >50 (P = 0.003). Conclusion Acne is a frequent and sometimes treatment-limiting side effect of UPA. Targeted counseling may support adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spencer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: