PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026ChemPhysChem0 citations

Quantification of Intramolecular (−) and (+) Charge‐Assisted Hydrogen Bond Energy via Molecular Tailoring Approach: Ranking in Energy Scale

View Full Paper
ААА. В. АфонинDRDanuta Rusińska‐Roszak

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify the energies of charge-assisted hydrogen bonds in anionic and cationic compounds using a molecular tailoring approach.
  • Utilized molecular tailoring approach for energy quantification of O−H···O − and N + −H···O bonds
  • Assessed a series of anionic and cationic compounds
  • Evaluated structural and spectral properties associated with hydrogen bonds
  • Charge-assisted hydrogen bond energies range from 15 to 43 kcal/mol for O−H···O − and 5 to 29 kcal/mol for N + −H···O
  • These energies are five and seven times stronger, on average, than those of conventional intramolecular hydrogen bonds
  • Significant changes observed in the geometry and spectral characteristics of charge-assisted hydrogen bonds compared to conventional bonds

Abstract

The energies of O−H···O − and N + −H···O charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds quantified via the method based on molecular tailoring approach for a series of anionic and cationic compounds. The energies of O−H···O − and N + −H···O charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds vary from 15 to 43 and from 5 to 29 kcal/mol, being five and seven times stronger, on average, respectively, than conventional intramolecular hydrogen bonds in neutral prototypes. The strengthening of (−) and (+) charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds in anions and cations relative to conventional hydrogen bonds in neutral compounds is accompanied by significant changes in the structural, spectral and theoretical hydrogen bond descriptors. The hydrogen bond geometry changes, the spectral manifestations of (−) and (+) charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds and process of electron transfer through hydrogen bond become more pronounced compared to conventional hydrogen bonds. The energies of (−) and (+) charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds and conventional hydrogen bonds are functionally related to the values of hydrogen bond descriptors, allowing the former to be evaluated using the latter. It has been shown that the energies of (−) and (+) charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds are the strongest of the known types of hydrogen bonds and belong in most cases to the category of strong hydrogen bonds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Афонин et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefde9fede9185760d4afbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.70390
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint1988 · 17,378 citations
  2. 2Gas-phase bihalide and pseudobihalide ions. An ion cyclotron resonance determination of hydrogen bond energies in XHY- species (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, CN)1984 · 138 citations
  3. 3Cooperative Strong Charge-Assisted N–H···O Hydrogen Bonding and Weaker Nonconventional C–H···N Hydrogen Bonding in the Formation of Extended Hydrogen-Bonded Networks with 2,3,5,6-Tetrafluorobenzoic Acid2020 · 12 citations
  4. 4Evidence for resonance-assisted hydrogen bonding. 4. Covalent nature of the strong homonuclear hydrogen bond. Study of the O-H--O system by crystal structure correlation methods1994 · 1,073 citations
  5. 5Understanding the Hydrogen Bond Using Quantum Chemistry1996 · 208 citations