Shows reduced flap compromise in vein-optimized technique, improving surgical outcomes.
Submental artery perforator flaps (SMAPF) represent valuable reconstructive options for head and neck defects, yet traditional artery-first dissection approaches inadequately protect complex submental vein (SMV) drainage variations, contributing to compromised flap outcomes. We systematically analyzed SMV drainage patterns to establish a standardized vein-protection-first technique. We retrospectively analyzed venous drainage patterns in 408 successfully harvested SMAPF cases (December 2017-December 2022), identifying source and peripheral drainage systems. A clinical dissection-based A-B-C technique was developed: Point A (intersection of the facial nerve marginal mandibular branch and facial vein), Point B (confluence of SMV and facial vein), and Point C (confluence of facial vein with internal jugular vein/external jugular vein/anterior jugular vein). Following standardized training of twelve surgeons, we conducted a retrospective pre-post comparative study comparing the conventional surgery group (January 1, 2023, to January 1, 2024; n = 62) and the vein-optimized group (February 1, 2024, to February 1, 2025; n = 55). The primary endpoint was flap compromise. All 408 SMAPF cases carried source drainage systems; 29.2% carried peripheral drainage. A-B-C classification revealed A-B-single C (93.4%), A-B-double C (5.6%), and A-B-triple C (1.0%) configurations. Spatial analysis identified Type I inverted T-shaped (18.1%) and Type II Y-shaped (81.9%) patterns. The vein-optimized group demonstrated significantly reduced flap compromise rates (OR = 0.183, 95% CI:0.040–0.844, p = 0.029), representing 81.7% risk reduction. Harvest time decreased significantly (p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis confirmed A-B-C technique as an independent protective factor. This novel A-B-C vein-optimized technique significantly reduces flap compromise and decreases operative duration. The standardized approach mitigates experience-dependent variability, providing a theoretical and practical framework for SMAPF clinical implementation and surgical training protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: