Key result
Percutaneous LVADs show potential benefits for AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock in this review.
Why the study?
Do percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) provide beneficial active circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock not responding to standard treatment?
Do percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) provide beneficial active circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock not responding to standard treatment?
This review summarizes the current experience and potential benefits of percutaneous LVADs in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock who do not respond to standard therapies like IABP.
May be considered in refractory AMI shock; leaves open net benefit of percutaneous LVADs versus standard care.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the most common cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition to percutaneous coronary intervention, inotropes, and fluids, intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is most widely used for initial haemodynamic stabilization. However, the main limitation of IABP is the lack of active circulatory support and the requirement of a certain level of left ventricular (LV) function. In many patients with severe depression of LV function, haemodynamic support and LV unloading derived from IABP is insufficient to reverse CS. The use of percutaneous LV assist devices (LVAD) with active circulatory support might be beneficial in CS patients not responding to standard treatment including IABP support. This review reports the current experience of percutaneous LVAD in CS complicating AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiele et al. (2007) conducted a review in Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) vs. Standard treatment including intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) was evaluated. This review summarizes the current experience and potential benefits of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: