Why the study?
Does the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multiguideline implementation produce cost savings in Alberta, Canada?
Does the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multiguideline implementation produce cost savings in Alberta, Canada?
ERAS multiguideline implementation is cost-saving, and future ROI analyses should consider broad health service utilization and efficiency metrics for sustainability.
These results demonstrated that ERAS multiguideline implementation was cost-saving in Alberta. To produce a better ROI, it is important to consider a broad range of health service utilizations, long-term impact, economies of scale, productive efficiency and allocative efficiency for sustainability, scale and spread of ERAS implementations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thành et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: