Why the study?
Is active surveillance a safe and appropriate strategy for patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs and preserved LVEF?
Is active surveillance a safe and appropriate strategy for patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs and preserved LVEF?
Active surveillance is an appropriate management strategy for patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs and normal LVEF due to the low risk of progression to LV dysfunction.
May support active surveillance for frequent idiopathic PVCs with preserved LVEF; leaves open prospective validation.
A strategy of active surveillance is appropriate for the majority of patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs in association with preserved LVEF, owing to the low risk of developing left ventricular systolic dysfunction and the high rate of spontaneous resolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: