PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología2 citationsOpen Access

GDF10 exacerbates metastatic burden and cachexia in murine models of cancer

LJLauren S. JamesASA SaundersCKC.S. Karagiannis

Key Points

  • This research explores GDF10's role in cancer progression, specifically its effects on metastasis and cachexia in murine models.
  • 4T1.2 mouse model of breast cancer and C-26 mouse model of cancer cachexia utilized.
  • Systemic rAAV6:GDF10 administration conducted to assess impacts on tumor growth and muscle wasting.
  • Primary tumor growth measured alongside metastatic and cachectic outcomes.
  • GDF10 administration did not change primary tumor growth but increased metastatic burden in 4T1.2 tumors.
  • Increased GDF10 expression worsened skeletal muscle wasting in C-26 tumor-bearing mice.
  • Findings contradicted initial expectations and highlighted GDF10's complex signaling in cancer.

Abstract

Metastasis and cancer-induced cachexia significantly reduce survivorship and quality of life for cancer patients. GDF10 (BMP3b) is a TGF-ß superfamily ligand with little knowledge of its role in cancer progression. Some studies have shown that GDF10 exerts tumor-suppressive effects in a range of cancer types and also plays a protective role against muscle wasting. Basal transcription of GDF10 was described previously to be downregulated in both primary tumors and cachectic muscle. Here, we set out to investigate the therapeutic potential of GDF10 in the 4T1.2 mouse model of breast cancer metastasis and in the C-26 mouse model of cancer cachexia, hypothesizing that GDF10 would ameliorate both metastatic and cachectic disease pathology. Systemic rAAV6:GDF10 administration to mice did not alter primary tumor growth; however, metastatic burden was increased in the mice bearing 4T1.2 tumors. Similarly, increased intramuscular rAAV6:GDF10 expression exacerbated skeletal muscle wasting in C-26 tumor-bearing mice. These results contradicted our initial hypothesis and highlight the complexity of signaling mechanisms utilized by BMP family ligands. Our data point to the need for more research to understand how to target GDF10 in anti-cancer therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04d9f727298f751e71e30https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1773275
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1GDF15 Drives Cachexia Through Multisystem Feed-Forward Loop2026
  2. 2Research progress on the biological function and molecular mechanism of GDF-15 in solid malignant tumors2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Targeting Cancer Cachexia: A Mechanistic Evaluation of Anti‐GDF‐15 Antibody‐Based Combination Therapies2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4GDF15: A Hijacked Metabo-Hormone Orchestrating Cachexia and Immunosuppression in Cancer2026
  5. 5Tumor-immune-neural circuit disrupts energy homeostasis in cancer cachexia2026 · 7 citations