PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026Journal of Aircraft0 citations

Aeroacoustic Installation Effects on a Propeller-Driven Strut-Braced Wing Aircraft

View Full Paper
ESEmanuele SticchiDRDaniele RagniDCDamiano Casalino

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the aeroacoustic and aerodynamic interactions of a propeller-driven strut-braced wing aircraft.
  • Conducted high-fidelity numerical simulations using very-large eddy simulation and lattice Boltzmann solver.
  • Analyzed clockwise and counterclockwise propeller rotation configurations.
  • Employed a hybrid CFD/CAA approach for aeroacoustic analysis.
  • Aerodynamic efficiency decreased by approximately 7–8% with propeller slipstream compared to propeller-off configuration.
  • Strut experienced a 21–25% lift increase with minimal drag impact from slipstream.
  • Outboard-up configuration noise footprint was 4 EPNdB lower than the inboard-up case.

Abstract

The strut-braced wing (SBW) is a promising design for reducing aircraft emissions. However, the integration with propellers introduces complex aerodynamic and aeroacoustic interactions. This study investigates the aerodynamic installation effects of a propeller-driven SBW aircraft in high-lift conditions. High-fidelity numerical simulations are carried out using a very-large eddy simulation approach coupled with a lattice Boltzmann solver. Two propeller rotation configurations are analyzed: clockwise and counterclockwise. The aeroacoustic analysis is conducted using a hybrid CFD/CAA approach based on the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings analogy. The propeller slipstream alters the wing loading, reducing aerodynamic efficiency by approximately 7–8% compared to the propeller-off configuration. New insights are provided into the role of the nacelle in modifying the wing loading. Aerodynamic efficiency benefits are found on the strut, experiencing a 21–25% lift increase with minimal drag impact caused by the slipstream. The blade loading exhibits asymmetry due to wing-induced upwash, amplifying tonal noise components at harmonics of the blade passing frequency. The effects of propeller wake impingement on both the wing and strut are analyzed, highlighting distinct interaction mechanisms and their implications on unsteady surface pressure. The noise footprint at certification locations for the outboard-up configuration is 4 EPNdB lower than that of the inboard-up case. This is because, when the blade moves downward on the inboard side, the fuselage blocks the sound waves from the propeller blades, creating a shadow region beneath the aircraft. These findings highlight the importance of component positioning in aircraft design to reduce far-field noise emissions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sticchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04e5b727298f751e7255fhttps://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038530
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper