This article explores labour law's impact on monopsony and wage stagnation in the UK, suggesting reforms for improvement.
Neoclassical economics holds that although labour markets will be marred by monopsony/oligopsony when they are not perfectly competitive, the likelihood of such a state of affairs is vanishingly small. However, recent research is mounting a formidable challenge to this assumption: data show that labour markets in many parts of the UK landmass and economy are indeed monopsonistic/oligopsonistic. One explanation is that labour markets incorporate frictions that impede labour mobility and costless job exits/quits. The outcome is threefold: wage stagnation, with workers remunerated below the competitive wage rate; heightened inequality; and overinflated prices paid by consumers. This article probes labour law’s role in generating, addressing and chilling monopsony/oligopsony and its adverse effects; the claim is made that since labour laws contribute towards the embedding of monopsony/oligopsony, their reform is part of the solution. Proposals are then presented for legislation adjusting labour laws governing particular clauses found in employment contracts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Cabrelli* (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: