Compares bio-rational and synthetic insecticides for maize yield in Nigeria, indicating effective pest management strategies.
The threat of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) to maize production in Nigeria is alsogrowing, and the use of full-rate synthetic insecticides brings ecological and resistanceissues. This research study compared bio-rational, synthetic insecticide, and IntegratedPest Management (IPM) systems in the management of FAW, canopy growth, and yield ofmaize in Abuja, Nigeria. It was performed as a Randomized Complete Block Design(RCBD) with four replications (2024-2025), and the incidence of the larvae, the damage tothe leaf, the canopy, and the yield of the plant were measured. Bio-rational and synthetictreatments had a significant effect in reducing the larval density and leaf damage comparedto the control (p ≤ 0.05). The yield of grains in the presence of Bacillus thuringiensis (3.95 t-1 -1 ha ) was statistically similar to that of chlorpyrifos (4.05 t ha ), and the highest yield was-1 4.35 t ha with λ-cyhalothrin. Treated plot yield gains were between 78 and 107 percent of-1 the control (2.10 t ha ). It should be noted that bio-rational treatments have been shown togive equivalent results in the field; this showed that even less risky options can giveagronomic performance that is statistically equivalent to that of conventional chemistries.However, this experiment was conducted in a single agroecological area and would have tobe multi-locationally validated prior to making general policy suggestions. These resultsindicate that bio-rational insecticides could be an effective part of threshold-based IPMstrategies in the sustainable production of maize in Nigeria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: