PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026International Journal of Intelligent Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Research Progress on Memristors for Compute‐In‐Memory Architectures

View Full Paper
YSYida ShangState Key Laboratory on Integrated OptoelectronicsXLXiang LinState Key Laboratory on Integrated OptoelectronicsXCXiangyang CheState Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics

Key Points

  • The research aims to review the latest developments in memristors and their applications in compute-in-memory technologies.
  • Conducted a systematic review of various types of memristors and their operating mechanisms.
  • Compared key performance parameters of different memristive devices.
  • Introduced integrated solutions for managing sneak-path current interference.
  • Memristors exhibit low power consumption and high-density integration capabilities.
  • Four types of memristors were analyzed: based on conductive filaments, phase-change, magnetic tunnel junction, and ferroelectric tunnel junction mechanisms.
  • The paper outlines typical application cases and presents an outlook on future developments in memristor technology.

Abstract

The era of artificial intelligence and big data has witnessed an explosive growth in computational demands. The von Neumann architecture faces constraints from the “memory wall” and “power wall” due to its separation of storage and computation. Compute‐in‐memory (CIM) technology has emerged as a key pathway to overcome the von Neumann bottleneck. As a novel class of semiconductor devices capable of both storage and computation, memristors offer advantages such as simple structure, low‐power consumption, and great potential for high‐density integration, showing great promise for CIM architectures. This article provides a systematic review of the latest research progress on memristors in terms of their operating mechanisms, array integration, and applications. It mainly focuses on the working principles, performance characteristics, and optimization strategies of four types of memristors based on the conductive filaments, phase‐change, magnetic tunnel junction, and ferroelectric tunnel junction mechanisms. Key performance parameters of various memristive devices are compared. In addition, the paper introduces multiple integrated solutions for overcoming sneak‐path current interference, presents typical application cases of memristors, and provides an outlook on future development, serving as a reference for further research on memristors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04e7d727298f751e72642https://doi.org/10.1155/int/8837606
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Memristors Development and In-Memory Computing Architecture2024
  2. 2Review of Memristors for In‐Memory Computing and Spiking Neural Networks2025 · 34 citations
  3. 3Memristors for the Post-Von Neumann Era: Hardware Paradigms, Neuromorphic Perception, and Computing Systems2026
  4. 4Memristor devices for next-generation computing: from performance optimization to application-specific co-design2025 · 7 citations
  5. 5Memristor-Based Architectures for AI at the Edge2025