Introduction Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a treatment for advanced colorectal polyps but can be challenging to adopt without advanced training or substantial experience. It is unclear if double channel endoscopy (DC) can facilitate learning. Methods: Patients who underwent DC-EMR were identified. Patient data was stratified by experience level: novice or expert. Expert endoscopists being those who have performed at least 30 DC-EMRs. Primary outcomes were differences in gross complete resection, procedure time, complications and interval polyp recurrence. Results: There were141 patients who underwent an attempt at DC-EMR. Of those,135 (96%) underwent complete endoscopic resection and 6 had an incomplete resection. Recurrent polyp was noted in 6 patients (6.8%) at 12-month follow-up, and in 8 additional patients (9.1%) who had longer follow-up. The overall incidence of recurrence was 15.9% (CI=9.6-25.1%). Sixty-five procedures were performed by 4 novice endoscopists (26, 19, 12, and 8 cases). One expert endoscopist performed the remaining 76 (55%) procedures. There was no difference between the groups in operative time (123 vs 113 vs min, p=0.39) or gross complete endoscopic resection (95% vs 100%, p= 0.10). There were fewer complications for the novice endoscopists (0 vs 6, p=0.03) and a trend toward a higher incidence of recurrence for the novice endoscopists (25% vs 9.6%, p=0.08). Conclusions: Novice endoscopists can successfully perform DC-EMR with similar operative time and successful resection compared to expert endoscopists, though with a trend toward higher recurrence. DC-EMR can be safely adopted by early practicing endoscopists with appropriate mentorship and institutional support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddharthan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: