Retrospective study analyzes imaging trends in children, revealing significant increases in usage and cancer risks.
OBJECTIVE Characterize cross-sectional imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], computed tomography [CT], ultrasonography [US]) use in children between 1997 and 2024. METHODS Retrospective cross-sectional study of cross-sectional imaging from Kaiser Permanente Northern. Cross-sectional imaging rates per 1000 children by modality, age, and body region were computed. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze trends in cross-sectional imaging use. RESULTS In total, 1 237 794 cross-sectional imaging examinations were performed in 18 132 171 children. From 2017 to 2024, cross-sectional imaging increased 50% (relative rate 1.46 [95% CI, 1.45–1.48]) from 79 (95% CI, 79–79) to 116 (95% CI, 115–117) examinations/1000 children associated with an average annual increase of 6.3% (95% CI, 5.0%–6.5%). Average annual MRI growth 2017 to 2024 was 6.7% (95% CI, 6.1%–7.3%); MRI use reached its peak rate in 2024: 41 (95% CI, 40–41) examinations/1000 children. CT use increased prior to 2009 (average annual change 7.6% [95% CI, 5.9%–9.2%]), decreased between 2009 and 2016 (average annual change: −2.9% [95% CI, −4.7% to −1.0%]), and then increased from 2017 to 2024 (average annual change: 7.3% [95% CI, 4.1%–11%]), reaching a peak rate of 26 (95% CI, 26–26) examinations/1000 children in 2024. Average annual change in US use 2017–2024 was 3.0% (95% CI, −0.3% to 6.4%), reaching its peak use rate in 2024 of 49 (95% CI, 49–49) examinations/1000 children. An estimated 8,880 future cancers in 2017 and 15,420 in 2024 in the United States may be attributable to CT use observed in this cohort. CONCLUSION Cross-sectional imaging use in children significantly increased over time, reaching its highest use in 2024. CT imaging grew markedly, reversing a previous trend of decreasing CT use. Additional research is needed to identify factors driving increased imaging use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahendra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: