Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates MT-125’s effect on glioblastoma, suggesting it may be a strong treatment option.
In a 2025 Cell study, Kenchappa et al. evaluated MT-125, a selective dual inhibitor of non-muscle myosin IIA/B (NMIIA/B) derived from the pan-myosin II inhibitor blebbistatin, as a therapeutic agent for glioblastoma (GBM). Mechanistically, MT-125 inhibits NMIIA/B to impair mitochondrial fission, causing mitochondrial elongation and elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS induce ferroptosis via lipid peroxidation and DNA damage (e.g., γH2AX upregulation) through poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage. Additionally, ROS activate platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) signaling, triggering RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 and PI3K–AKT–mTOR cascades; mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) further amplifies ROS production, forming a pro-apoptotic positive feedback loop. In in vitro assays and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of GBM, MT-125 significantly reduced tumor proliferation (via multinucleation) and invasion, prolonged survival, and exhibited favorable drug properties, including high brain permeability and a safety profile characterized by minimal toxicity to normal cells/organs, and no sex-based weight differences. Combination therapies (MT-125 with Sunitinib, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K]/mTOR inhibitors, or radiotherapy) outperformed monotherapies in suppressing tumor growth and enhancing apoptosis. This study identifies NMII as a key GBM target and highlights MT-125’s strong therapeutic potential, though further research is needed to assess its risk of inducing chromosomal instability/aneuploidy in normal cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: