Identifies nine money laundering mechanisms across financial technologies, indicating adaptability in future threats.
Existing taxonomies of money laundering classify schemes by instrument, sector, or jurisdictional context, producing catalogues that become obsolete as technology evolves. We propose a mechanism-based evolutionary taxonomy: nine fundamental mechanisms that underlie all known laundering strategies, each expressed in four evolutionary versions — traditional, non-crypto digital, cryptocurrency, and zero-knowledge cryptographic. The core argument is that mechanisms are invariant across technological substrates: an adversary who understands the mechanism recognizes its instantiation in any future instrument. Validated against 23 enforcement actions totalling over $20 billion in documented cases from 2010 to 2025, with a formal detection surface metric δ(M,v) enabling quantitative comparison across mechanism-version pairs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alejandro Jaime (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: