Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OCR engines operating at reduced resolution produce degraded text with systematic character-level errors — broken words, misrecognized characters, and corrupted numerical sequences. Current post-processing approaches rely on fuzzy matching algorithms that achieve moderate quality at near-zero latency but fail on domain-specific terminology and structured sequences absent from predefined vocabularies. Prior work established that a Ray-based parallel OCR pipeline achieves 69.9× speedup on 11,368 banking document pages but produces a Character Error Rate of 24.78% at 100 DPI — a quality gap that fuzzy matching cannot close. This paper proposes LLM-Guided Sequence Reconstruction (LLM-GSR), a post-processing architecture that replaces dictionary-based correction with a large language model operating as a sequence predictor over degraded OCR output. The key insight is that OCR degradation produces incomplete sequences that a language model can reconstruct through next-token prediction conditioned on domain context — precisely the task for which language models are optimized. We formalize the boundary of applicability through a Reconstruction Precondition grounded in information theory, and validate the architecture on the same 11,368-page banking corpus, measuring CER reduction, latency overhead, and throughput under parallel inference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alejandro Jaime (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: