Key result
Biomarker-based ABC-AF-stroke score outperforms CHA2DS2-VASc in predicting stroke or systemic embolism.
Why the study?
In patients with AF, the risk of ischemic stroke is central to stroke-prevention treatment recommendations, prompting evaluation of the ABC-AF-stroke score and development of a modified ABC-AF-istroke score.
Cohort (n=26,452)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABC-AF-stroke may refine AF risk stratification; leaves open routine adoption pending randomized validation.
BACKGROUND In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) the risk of ischemic stroke is central to recommendations for stroke-prevention treatment. OBJECTIVES The authors evaluated the biomarker-based Age, Biomarkers, Clinical history (ABC)-AF-stroke risk score and developed a modified ABC-AF-istroke risk score for prediction of respectively total and ischemic stroke in patients with AF. METHODS In 26,452 patients with AF assigned to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin, information on age, clinical history of stroke, and levels of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin were used for calculation of the ABC-AF-stroke score and the modified ABC-AF-istroke score. RESULTS During follow-up, there were 756 cases with stroke or systemic embolism (SEE) including 534 with ischemic stroke/SEE. The discrimination of total stroke/SEE was superior for the ABC-AF-stroke score, C-index (0.667 [95% CI: 0.648-0.687]), compared with 0.632 (95% CI: 0.612-0.652) for the ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) and 0.614 (95% CI: 0.594-0.633) for the CHA2DS2-VASc score (P < 0.001 for both). The results were similar for ischemic stroke/SEE with C-index for ABC-AF-istroke 0.677 (95% CI: 0.654-0.700) compared with 0.642 (95% CI: 0.618-0.666) for the ATRIA and 0.624 (95% CI: 0.601-0.647) for the CHA2DS2-VASc score (P < 0.001 for both). The ABC-AF-stroke scores showed good calibration for total and ischemic stroke. Results were consistent in relevant subgroups. Decision curve analyses showed a net benefit concerning stroke-prevention decision thresholds. CONCLUSIONS The biomarker-based ABC-AF risk scores for the risk of total and ischemic stroke were well calibrated, showed better discrimination than clinical risk scores in predicting total and ischemic stroke, and provided meaningful decision support for stroke-prevention treatments in patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wallentin et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=26,452). ABC-AF-stroke and ABC-AF-istroke risk scores vs. ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores was evaluated on Total stroke or systemic embolism (SEE) (C-index 0.667, 95% CI 0.648-0.687, p=< 0.001). The biomarker-based ABC-AF-stroke score demonstrated superior discrimination for total stroke or systemic embolism (C-index 0.667) compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score (C-index 0.614) (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: