PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 27, 2020Circulation405 citationsOpen Access

An International, Multicentered, Evidence-Based Reappraisal of Genes Reported to Cause Congenital Long QT Syndrome

AAArnon AdlerVNValeria NovelliAAAhmad S. Amin

Structured PICO

What is the level of evidence for the 17 genes reported to cause Congenital Long QT Syndrome?

P
Population
17 genes reported to cause Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)
I
Intervention
Evidence-based reappraisal by 3 blinded gene curation teams and a Clinical Domain Channelopathy Working Group
O
Outcome
Level of evidence for causation of LQTS

More than half of the genes historically reported to cause Long QT Syndrome lack sufficient evidence, indicating they should not be used for clinical decision-making without new evidence.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is the first described and most common inherited arrhythmia. Over the last 25 years, multiple genes have been reported to cause this condition and are routinely tested in patients. Because of dramatic changes in our understanding of human genetic variation, reappraisal of reported genetic causes for LQTS is required. METHODS: Utilizing an evidence-based framework, 3 gene curation teams blinded to each other's work scored the level of evidence for 17 genes reported to cause LQTS. A Clinical Domain Channelopathy Working Group provided a final classification of these genes for causation of LQTS after assessment of the evidence scored by the independent curation teams. RESULTS: ) had moderate level evidence for causing LQTS. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the genes reported as causing LQTS have limited or disputed evidence to support their disease causation. Genetic variants in these genes should not be used for clinical decision-making, unless accompanied by new and sufficient genetic evidence. The findings of insufficient evidence to support gene-disease associations may extend to other disciplines of medicine and warrants a contemporary evidence-based evaluation for previously reported disease-causing genes to ensure their appropriate use in precision medicine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adler et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f14acf2811130d0cde1f00https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.119.043132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1INTERMITTENT MUSCULAR WEAKNESS, EXTRASYSTOLES, AND MULTIPLE DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES1971 · 300 citations
  2. 2A common genetic variant in the NOS1 regulator NOS1AP modulates cardiac repolarization2006 · 552 citations
  3. 3Congenital deaf-mutism, functional heart disease with prolongation of the Q-T interval, and sudden death1957 · 1,606 citations
  4. 4A global reference for human genetic variation2015 · 20,385 citations
  5. 5Prevalence of the Congenital Long-QT Syndrome2009 · 1,086 citations