Key result
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness polygenic score links to ~1.6 mL/kg/min higher fitness and lower mortality.
Why the study?
Cardiorespiratory fitness has a strong genetic component and low CRF is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, motivating development of a polygenic score for CRF.
Does a high polygenic score for cardiorespiratory fitness predict higher phenotypic fitness and lower risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality?
Cohort (n=151,852)
Yes
Does a high polygenic score for cardiorespiratory fitness predict higher phenotypic fitness and lower risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality?
A novel polygenic score for cardiorespiratory fitness successfully identifies individuals with higher lifelong fitness levels and is associated with reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports polygenic fitness scoring in research cohorts; hypothesis-generating for clinical risk prediction and requires prospective validation.
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has a strong genetic component and low CRF is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a polygenic score (PGS) for CRF (CRF PGS ) and assess its associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. We hypothesized that the CRF PGS would demonstrate similar cardioprotective benefits as the CRF phenotype. Effect estimates from a genome-wide association study on directly measured CRF in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT; n = 4525) were used in a Bayesian regression framework to develop multiple PGSs in an independent cohort from the UK Biobank ( n = 65,165). The top performing score was applied in the HUNT target cohort, excluding the discovery sample ( n = 82,109). The PGS-CRF association varied considerably as a function of model fit and phenotypic accuracy. There was a difference of 1.55 [95% confidence interval: 1.26, 1.84] mL·kg −1 ·min −1 between the bottom and top decile of the CRF PGS . Moreover, a high CRF PGS demonstrated cardioprotective effects, with reduced risk for CVD, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and all-cause mortality. Additionally, in women, we observed that the CRF PGS predisposed to lower risk of heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We developed the first PGS for CRF using gold standard phenotypes and multiple independent cohorts. Genetic susceptibility to high CRF may have a clinically meaningful impact on the phenotype. The CRF PGS was better to identify individuals with slightly higher lifelong levels of CRF, which appears to protect against cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Øvretveit et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular disease (n=151,852). Polygenic score for cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF PGS) vs. Bottom decile of CRF PGS was evaluated on Difference in estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) between the bottom and top decile of the CRF PGS (MD 1.55, 95% CI 1.26, 1.84). A polygenic score for cardiorespiratory fitness yielded a 1.55 mL·kg-1·min-1 difference in estimated fitness between the top and bottom deciles, and higher scores were associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: