Key result
Achieving target LDL-C after STEMI is linked to ~63% lower 3-year neoatherosclerosis prevalence.
Why the study?
Does achieving guideline-endorsed target LDL-C levels reduce the prevalence of neoatherosclerosis in patients with STEMI after DES implantation?
RCT (n=178)
Yes
Does achieving guideline-endorsed target LDL-C levels reduce the prevalence of neoatherosclerosis in patients with STEMI after DES implantation?
Odds Ratio: 3 (95% CI 1.19–8.24)
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 19%
p-value: p=.02
Achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C levels after STEMI is associated with a significantly lower prevalence of neoatherosclerosis at 3 years, supporting aggressive lipid lowering to prevent late stent failure.
Importance: Neoatherosclerosis represents a major cause of late stent failure and results in cardiac events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Achieving secondary preventive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels can reduce plaque progression in native coronary arteries; however, its association with neoatherosclerosis formation remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether achieving guideline-endorsed LDL-C levels after DES implantation is associated with reduced risk of long-term neoatherosclerosis formation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc analysis of the CONNECT randomized clinical trial conducted at 7 sites in Switzerland and Japan that had randomized 239 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with biodegradable- or durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents between June 2017 and June 2020. The prevalence of neoatherosclerosis was assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3 years after primary PCI. Data analysis for this post hoc analysis was conducted from September 2024 to October 2025. Intervention: Patients with STEMI received primary PCI with DES, and statin therapy was recommended according to country-specific guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of neoatherosclerosis 3 years after primary PCI was compared between patients with vs without achievement of guideline-endorsed target LDL-C levels. A multivariable predictor analysis was performed to determine whether on-treatment LDL-C levels were associated with occurrence of neoatherosclerosis. Results: Among 178 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.4 [10.9] years; 27 [15%] female) who underwent OCT at 3 years, 98 patients (55%) achieved the target LDL-C level and 80 patients (45%) did not. The mean (SD) on-treatment LDL-C levels for these groups were 48 (13) and 87 (37) mg/dL, respectively (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259). The prevalence of neoatherosclerosis was lower in patients who achieved the target LDL-C level as compared with patients who did not (7 patients [7%] vs 15 patients [19%], respectively; odds ratio for those who did not achieve the LDL-C target level, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.19-8.24; P = .02). On-treatment LDL-C level (per 25-mg/dL increase) emerged as an independent determinant of neoatherosclerosis at 3 years in multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-2.01; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: On-treatment LDL-C level emerged as an independent predictor of neoatherosclerosis 3 years after DES implantation for STEMI. Neoatherosclerosis was less frequent among patients who achieved the guideline-recommended on-treatment LDL-C level, underscoring the importance of LDL-C lowering in preventing neoatherosclerosis formation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03440801.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Häner et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=178). Achieving guideline-endorsed target LDL-C levels vs. Not achieving target LDL-C levels was evaluated on Prevalence of neoatherosclerosis 3 years after primary PCI (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.19-8.24, p=.02). Achieving guideline-endorsed target LDL-C levels after STEMI was associated with a lower prevalence of neoatherosclerosis at 3 years compared with not achieving the target (7% vs 19%; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: