PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026JBI Evidence Implementation0 citationsOpen Access

Management of immune-related dermatologic toxicities in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: a best practice implementation project

View Full Paper
LZLanfang ZhangZLZhijun LiSHS H. M. Huang

Key Points

  • To enhance the management of immune-related dermatologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
  • Utilized the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework.
  • Conducted baseline and follow-up audits to identify compliance gaps and barriers.
  • Implemented change strategies to improve adherence to best practices.
  • Identified gaps in compliance for six audit criteria.
  • Five barriers to implementation were highlighted.
  • Follow-up audit showed compliance reached 100% for most criteria, with criterion 6 improving from 36.7% to 50%.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used as an important approach to treat tumors. However, about 30% patients receiving ICIs develop immune-related dermatologic toxicities (IDTs), which may lead to treatment interruption and poor prognosis. OBJECTIVES: This evidence implementation project was carried out in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Nanfang Hospital in Guangzhou, China and aimed to improve the management of IDTs in cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: The project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is based on an audit and feedback process. Criteria for audits were derived from JBI Best Practice Evidence Summaries. The baseline audit was used to identify gaps in compliance with best practices and barriers and facilitators of implementation. After the implementation of change strategies, a follow-up audit was conducted to measure changes in compliance. RESULTS: Gaps between evidence and practice were noted for six of the criteria, and five barriers to implementation were identified. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance with audit criteria 1-5, 7, and 8 reached 100%, while criterion 6 partially improved from 36.7% to 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that this project improved compliance with evidence-based practices for the management of IDTs by standardizing clinical practices and improving the quality of nursing management. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A550.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154c0879cb923c494502fhttps://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predictive factors and outcomes of immune-related adverse events in Chinese patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world retrospective study2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors2019 · 1,170 citations
  3. 3Inflammatory eruptions associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A single-institution retrospective analysis with stratification of reactions by toxicity and implications for management2018 · 187 citations
  4. 4Improving the nursing quality of non-pharmacological interventions for elderly patients with constipation in hospital: a best practice implementation project2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial2016 · 4,807 citations