Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis

Xu et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Coronary stenosis (n=308). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) vs. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and wire-based FFR was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of QFR exceeding a lower 95% CI boundary of 75% (95% CI 88.9% to 95.1%, p=< 0.001). Online quantitative flow ratio (QFR) achieved a patient-level diagnostic accuracy of 92.4% (95% CI: 88.9% to 95.1%; p<0.001) for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f178a3adb7394e289b48a2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1. Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China· 2016 · 94 citations
2. Quantitative Coronary Arteriography· 2004 · 39 citations
3. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant Stenosis· 2007 · 1,502 citations
4. Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Routine Coronary Angiograms· 2016 · 51 citations
5. Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis