Why the study?
Routine manual thrombus aspiration in STEMI does not improve clinical outcomes and is associated with increased stroke, but the safety of mechanical thrombus aspiration remains unknown.
Does AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy improve clinical outcomes or increase stroke risk in patients with TIMI thrombus grade 5?
Does AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy improve clinical outcomes or increase stroke risk in patients with TIMI thrombus grade 5?
In patients with TIMI thrombus grade 5, AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy did not improve 1-year clinical outcomes but also did not increase the risk of stroke.
No MACE difference seen with AngioJet in matched high-thrombus patients; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy among patients with high thrombus burden.BACKGROUND Routine manual thrombus aspiration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not improve clinical outcomes and was associated with an increased rate of stroke. However, the safety of mechanical thrombus aspirationis still unknown.METHODS This was a single-center study involving 621 patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade 5. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)within 12 months. The safety outcome was stroke within 1-year. RESULTS AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy was performed in 117 patients. After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference both in the incidence of MACE(11.1% vs 17.9%, hazard ratio, 1.641; 95% confidence interval[CI], 0.822 to 3.277, p=.161) and the incidences of stroke (1.7% vs 2.6%, hazard ratio, 1.522; 95% confidence interval[CI], 0.254 to 9.107, p=.646)between two groups at 1-year follow-up.CONCLUSIONS In patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade 5, AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomydid not improve clinical outcomesat 1 year. However, AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy did not increase the risk of stroke in patients with high thrombus burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: