Why the study?
Although healthcare providers are encouraged to include physical exercise in care and treatment strategies, a crucial point in administering this intervention is optimal dosing and prescription.
This perspective article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to prescribing physical interventions and highlights areas for further investigation.
Individualized physical intervention prescribing requires balancing trade-offs; leaves open optimal strategies pending comparative trials.
It is well recognized that regular physical exercise has positive effects on physical and mental health. To use the beneficial health effects of physical exercise, there are worldwide movements encouraging health care providers to include physical exercise in their care and treatments strategies. However, a crucial point in administering the "exercise polypill" is the dosing and, in turn, the prescription of the physical intervention (PI). In this perspective article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to prescribe PI. In this context, we also highlight outstanding questions and potential areas of opportunity for further investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herold et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: