Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review reveals moderate mental health issues in digital education for students, suggesting necessary support strategies.
Digital learning in higher education expanded rapidly after the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence on its impact on well-being in academia remains limited. To date, no comprehensive synthesis has examined well-being outcomes in post-pandemic, digitally mediated higher education . This scoping review synthesises research on student andstaff well-being in digital, post-pandemichigher education . Systematic searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC (2021–2025). Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Findings were synthesised narratively. Seven cross-sectional studies involving 3,744 students met inclusion criteria; no eligible studies on teaching staff were identified. Most studies reported moderate stress, depression, and anxiety, with insomnia and burnout ranging from low to moderate. Well-being was associated with learning preferences, digital tool satisfaction, institutional support, and traits such as self-management. Common barriers included assessment-related stress, digital fatigue, social isolation, and infrastructure limitations. Post-pandemic digital education is associated with moderate psychological and emotional burden among students, shaped by individual and contextual factors. The absence of staff-focused research represents a significant structural gap in the literature. Institutions should adopt strategies to support well-being in digital settings, and future research must address diverse digital formats and prioritise the well-being of both students and teaching staff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanabria-Mazo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: