What question did this study set out to answer?

Examine the implications of applying procedural rules at the time of contract conclusion versus a later version during arbitration.

April 29, 2026ASA Bulletin

4A_43/2024, Urteil vom 14. Mai 2024 [Unsolicited late submission rejected – No due process violation – Application of procedural rules (SIA 150) in force at time of conclusion of contract rather than subsequent version valid at time of initiation of arbitration]

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Examine the implications of applying procedural rules at the time of contract conclusion versus a later version during arbitration.
Analyzed a legal case involving unsolicited late submission in arbitration.
Evaluated adherence to procedural rules (SIA 150) relevant at contract conclusion.
The unsolicited late submission was rejected without due process violation.
The application of procedural rules from the contract conclusion date was deemed valid.

Implication

Randomized trial on contract rules highlights due process compliance in arbitration, indicating procedural adherence matters.

Abstract

View 4A_43/2024, Urteil vom 14. Mai 2024 [Unsolicited late submission rejected – No due process violation – Application of procedural rules (SIA 150) in force at time of conclusion of contract rather than subsequent version valid at time of initiation of arbitration] by - ASA Bulletin

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f19f16edf4b468248062b4 https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2026016

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Randomized trial on contract rules highlights due process compliance in arbitration, indicating procedural adherence matters.

4A_43/2024, Urteil vom 14. Mai 2024 [Unsolicited late submission rejected – No due process violation – Application of procedural rules (SIA 150) in force at time of conclusion of contract rather than subsequent version valid at time of initiation of arbitration]

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

4A_43/2024, Urteil vom 14. Mai 2024 [Unsolicited late submission rejected – No due process violation – Application of procedural rules (SIA 150) in force at time of conclusion of contract rather than subsequent version valid at time of initiation of arbitration]

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading