Nationwide cohort study analyzes survival outcomes of lung transplant recipients based on donor criteria and urgency status.
Background:The use of extended-criteria donors (ECDs) in lung transplantation remains high in Korea; however, their impact on survival outcomes is not fully understood.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,251 adult lung transplant recipients registered with the Korea Network for Organ Sharing (2010-2023).ECDs were defined as donors aged 55 years with a smoking history 20 pack-years or a PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio 300.Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression, with subgroup comparisons by urgency (status 0 vs. status 1-4) and age (< 65 vs. 65 years).Results: Of the 1,251 recipients, 33.7% received ECD lungs.In the multivariable analysis, recipient age, urgency status 0, and ECD use were independently associated with increased one-year mortality.In subgroup analyses, ECD use was consistently associated with higher mortality in status 1-4 recipients (P < 0.001), whereas in status 0 recipients it showed only a trend toward decreased survival (P = 0.056).Among elderly recipients, ECD use significantly increased mortality in status 1-4 but showed only a trend toward decreased survival in status 0 (P = 0.071).In contrast, among younger recipients, ECD use increased mortality in status 1-4 but had no significant effect in status 0. Conclusion: ECD use was consistently associated with higher one-year mortality in recipients with urgency status 1-4, irrespective of age.In contrast, among status 0 recipients, the effect differed by age.These findings highlight the importance of incorporating both recipient urgency and age into donor lung selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: